HomeChanakya NitiCh. 17Shloka 8

Shloka 8

Liberation and Truth — Chanakya Niti

तक्षकस्य विषं दन्ते मक्षिकायास्तु मस्तके ।

वृश्चिकस्य विषं पुच्छे सर्वाङ्गे दुर्जने विषम् ॥

takṣakasya viṣaṃ dante makṣikāyāstu mastake |

vṛścikasya viṣaṃ pucche sarvāṅge durjane viṣam ||

A snake’s poison is in its fangs, a fly/bee’s in its head, a scorpion’s in its tail; but a wicked person’s poison pervades the whole body.

तक्षकस्यof the (snake) Takṣaka
तक्षकस्य:
TypeNoun
Rootतक्षक
Formपुंलिङ्गः, षष्ठी, एकवचनम्
विषम्poison
विषम्:
TypeNoun
Rootविष
Formनपुंसकलिङ्गः, प्रथमा/द्वितीया, एकवचनम्
दन्तेin the tooth/fang
दन्ते:
TypeNoun
Rootदन्त
Formपुंलिङ्गः, सप्तमी, एकवचनम्
मक्षिकायाःof the fly
मक्षिकायाः:
TypeNoun
Rootमक्षिका
Formस्त्रीलिङ्गः, षष्ठी, एकवचनम्
तुbut/indeed
तु:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootतु
Formअव्ययम्
मस्तकेin the head
मस्तके:
TypeNoun
Rootमस्तक
Formनपुंसकलिङ्गः, सप्तमी, एकवचनम्
वृश्चिकस्यof the scorpion
वृश्चिकस्य:
TypeNoun
Rootवृश्चिक
Formपुंलिङ्गः, षष्ठी, एकवचनम्
विषम्poison
विषम्:
TypeNoun
Rootविष
Formनपुंसकलिङ्गः, प्रथमा/द्वितीया, एकवचनम्
पुच्छेin the tail
पुच्छे:
TypeNoun
Rootपुच्छ
Formनपुंसकलिङ्गः, सप्तमी, एकवचनम्
सर्वाङ्गेin the whole body
सर्वाङ्गे:
TypeNoun
Rootसर्वाङ्ग
Formनपुंसकलिङ्गः, सप्तमी, एकवचनम्
दुर्जनेin a wicked person
दुर्जने:
TypeNoun
Rootदुर्जन
Formपुंलिङ्गः, सप्तमी, एकवचनम्
विषम्poison
विषम्:
TypeNoun
Rootविष
Formनपुंसकलिङ्गः, प्रथमा/द्वितीया, एकवचनम्
Chanakya (Kautilya)
अनुष्टुप्
Nīti LiteratureAncient Ethics (Descriptive)Political-Moral AphorismsClassical Sanskrit Philology
Takṣaka (serpent)Fly (makṣikā)Scorpion (vṛścika)Wicked person (durjana)

FAQs

In the wider Nītiśāstra (didactic ethics/statecraft) tradition, compact zoological metaphors are used to classify social types and risks within courtly and civic life. This verse reflects a premodern rhetorical habit of mapping moral or social danger onto familiar animals associated with venom, thereby offering a memorable typology of harm within interpersonal and political environments.

The term viṣa (‘poison’) functions both literally (venom located in particular body parts of animals) and metaphorically (a pervasive harmful disposition attributed to the durjana). The verse’s contrast relies on localization versus pervasiveness: animal venom is anatomically situated, while the ‘poison’ of the durjana is portrayed as diffused throughout the person’s being, indicating an all-encompassing capacity to cause harm.

The construction uses parallel genitives (takṣakasya, makṣikāyāḥ, vṛścikasya) with locatives (dante, mastake, pucche) to create a patterned, mnemonic list, culminating in the locative durjane with sarvāṅge (‘in every limb’) to heighten contrast. The metaphor depends on culturally recognizable associations of venomous creatures; the final clause shifts from zoology to moral anthropology, a common move in Sanskrit gnomic literature.