HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 1Shloka 37

Shloka 37

Arjuna Vishada YogaThe Yoga of Arjuna's Despondency

Bhagavad Gita 37 illustration

यद्यप्येते न पश्यन्ति लोभोपहतचेतसः । कुलक्षयकृतं दोषं मित्रद्रोहे च पातकम् ॥ १.३७ ॥

yady apy ete na paśyanti lobhopahata-cetasaḥ | kula-kṣaya-kṛtaṃ doṣaṃ mitra-drohe ca pātakam || 1.37 ||

Though these people, their minds overpowered by greed, do not see the fault that arises from the destruction of the family, nor the sin in betraying friends…

Though these people, with minds overpowered by greed, do not see the fault arising from the destruction of the family and the wrongdoing in betraying friends…

Even if these, whose minds are impaired by greed, do not perceive the defect caused by the ruin of the lineage and the transgression in treachery toward allies…

Mitra-droha can mean betrayal of friends/allies and, more broadly, violation of reciprocal trust. Kula-kṣaya is not only physical loss but the collapse of lineage-based institutions and practices.

यद्यपिalthough
यद्यपि:
Rootयद् + अपि
एतेthese (people)
एते:
Karta
Rootएतद्
not
:
Root
पश्यन्तिthey see
पश्यन्ति:
Root√पश् (दृश्)
लोभgreed
लोभ:
Rootलोभ
उपहतstruck/overpowered
उपहत:
Root√हन् (उप + √हन्)
चेतसःminds
चेतसः:
Karta
Rootचेतस्
कुलfamily/lineage
कुल:
Rootकुल
क्षयdestruction
क्षय:
Rootक्षय
कृतम्done/caused (by)
कृतम्:
Root√कृ
दोषम्fault/evil consequence
दोषम्:
Karma
Rootदोष
मित्रfriend
मित्र:
Rootमित्र
द्रोहेin betrayal/treachery
द्रोहे:
Adhikarana
Rootद्रोह
and
:
Root
पातकम्sin (grave wrongdoing)
पातकम्:
Karma
Rootपातक
Arjuna
Lobha (greed)Moha (delusion)Ethical perception (moral blindness)
Greed as cognitive distortionSocial trust and betrayalConsequences of lineage disruption

FAQs

The verse portrays greed as a force that narrows moral vision, a theme common in Indian ethical literature: strong desire can impair judgment and empathy.

Moral ‘seeing’ (paśyanti) implies discernment (viveka). The later teaching develops how clarity arises from disciplined understanding rather than reactive emotion.

Arjuna contrasts his own awareness with what he claims is the opponents’ greed-driven failure to recognize broader communal harm.

It can be applied to institutional ethics: competitive self-interest may obscure long-term harms to trust, community stability, and shared norms.