HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 1Shloka 31

Shloka 31

Arjuna Vishada YogaThe Yoga of Arjuna's Despondency

Bhagavad Gita 31 illustration

न च श्रेयोऽनुपश्यामि हत्वा स्वजनमाहवे । न काङ्क्षे विजयं कृष्ण न च राज्यं सुखानि च ॥ १.३१ ॥

na ca śreyo'nupaśyāmi hatvā svajanam āhave | na kāṅkṣe vijayaṃ kṛṣṇa na ca rājyaṃ sukhāni ca || 1.31 ||

I do not perceive any true good in slaying my own kinsmen in battle. O Kṛṣṇa, I desire neither victory, nor kingdom, nor pleasures.

I do not see any good in engaging in battle after opposing my own people. O Kṛṣṇa, I do not desire victory, nor kingdom, nor pleasures.

And I do not perceive what is better (śreyas) after confronting my own kin in battle. O Kṛṣṇa, I do not wish for victory, nor for sovereignty, nor for enjoyments.

Śreyas can be rendered as “good,” “the better course,” or “spiritual welfare.” The verse frames Arjuna’s hesitation as an evaluative (ethical/prudential) judgment rather than fear alone.

not
:
Root
and
:
Root
श्रेयःthe good; welfare; what is better
श्रेयः:
Karma
Rootश्रेयस्
अनुपश्यामिI see; I foresee
अनुपश्यामि:
Karta
Root√पश् (दृश्)
हत्वाhaving slain
हत्वा:
Root√हन्
स्वजनम्one's own people/kinsmen
स्वजनम्:
Karma
Rootस्वजन
आहवेin battle
आहवे:
Adhikarana
Rootआहव
not
:
Root
काङ्क्षेI desire; I long for
काङ्क्षे:
Karta
Root√काङ्क्ष्
विजयम्victory
विजयम्:
Karma
Rootविजय
कृष्णO Krishna
कृष्ण:
Rootकृष्ण
not
:
Root
and
:
Root
राज्यम्kingdom; sovereignty
राज्यम्:
Karma
Rootराज्य
सुखानिpleasures; comforts; happinesses
सुखानि:
Karma
Rootसुख
and
:
Root
Arjuna
DharmaŚreyas vs preyasMoha (delusion)Viveka (discernment)
Moral hesitationRenunciation of outcomesConflict between duty and attachment

FAQs

Arjuna’s statement reflects acute moral stress: anticipated loss of valued relationships makes external success (victory, power) appear meaningless, a common feature of ethical conflict where personal bonds override instrumental goals.

The verse introduces the śreyas/preyas tension: what seems immediately preferable (avoiding painful action) may conflict with a deeper notion of the ‘better’ grounded in dharma, which later teaching reframes through self-knowledge and non-attachment.

This is part of Arjuna’s opening crisis in which he questions the value of participation in a dynastic conflict when it entails confronting his own kin.

It can be read as a case study in values clarification: when goals like status or success feel hollow, one must re-examine guiding principles and responsibilities rather than acting solely from impulse or aversion.