HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 1Shloka 26

Shloka 26

Arjuna Vishada YogaThe Yoga of Arjuna's Despondency

Bhagavad Gita 26 illustration

तत्रापश्यत्स्थितान्पार्थः पितॄनथ पितामहान् । आचार्यान्मातुलान्भ्रातॄन्पुत्रान्पौत्रान्सखींस्तथा ॥ १.२६ ॥

tatrāpaśyat sthitān pārthaḥ pitṝn atha pitāmahān | ācāryān mātulān bhrātṝn putrān pautrān sakhīṁs tathā || 1.26 ||

There Pārtha beheld, standing arrayed, fathers and grandfathers, teachers, maternal uncles, brothers, sons, grandsons, and friends as well.

There Pārtha saw stationed fathers and grandfathers, teachers, maternal uncles, brothers, sons, grandsons, and friends as well.

There Pārtha saw standing: fathers, grandfathers, teachers, maternal uncles, brothers, sons, grandsons, and also friends.

Some recensions continue the list into the next verse(s); the present verse is a catalog of relations, central to the ethical tension. The academic translation maintains the enumerative structure.

तत्रthere (in that place)
तत्र:
Adhikarana
Rootतत्र
अपश्यत्saw
अपश्यत्:
Root√पश् (दृश्)
स्थितान्standing, stationed
स्थितान्:
Karma
Root√स्था
पार्थःPartha (Arjuna, son of Pṛthā)
पार्थः:
Karta
Rootपार्थ
पितॄन्fathers
पितॄन्:
Karma
Rootपितृ
अथand then; also
अथ:
Rootअथ
पितामहान्grandfathers
पितामहान्:
Karma
Rootपितामह
आचार्यान्teachers, preceptors
आचार्यान्:
Karma
Rootआचार्य
मातुलान्maternal uncles
मातुलान्:
Karma
Rootमातुल
भ्रातॄन्brothers
भ्रातॄन्:
Karma
Rootभ्रातृ
पुत्रान्sons
पुत्रान्:
Karma
Rootपुत्र
पौत्रान्grandsons
पौत्रान्:
Karma
Rootपौत्र
सखीन्friends
सखीन्:
Karma
Rootसखि
तथाlikewise; also
तथा:
Rootतथा
Sanjaya (narration)
DharmaKinship obligationsCompassion (dayā/kṛpā)
Relational conflictMoral dilemmaHuman cost of duty

FAQs

Recognition of close relations triggers empathic distress and role-conflict: Arjuna’s warrior duty collides with familial and social bonds.

The catalog can symbolize the many identities the self inhabits (son, student, friend), which later teachings interrogate in light of a deeper self-understanding.

This recognition scene is the narrative hinge: Arjuna’s crisis becomes intelligible as a conflict between dharma and attachment.

Ethical decisions often involve multiple roles and relationships; acknowledging them explicitly helps clarify what is at stake.