HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 1Shloka 17

Shloka 17

Arjuna Vishada YogaThe Yoga of Arjuna's Despondency

Bhagavad Gita 17 illustration

काश्यश्च परमेष्वासः शिखण्डी च महारथः । धृष्टद्युम्नो विराटश्च सात्यकिश्चापराजितः ॥ १.१७ ॥

kāśyaś ca parameṣvāsaḥ śikhaṇḍī ca mahā-rathaḥ | dhṛṣṭadyumno virāṭaś ca sātyakiś cāparājitaḥ || 1.17 ||

And the supreme archer, the king of Kāśī; and Śikhaṇḍī, the great chariot-warrior; Dhṛṣṭadyumna and Virāṭa; and Sātyaki, the unconquered—

“परम धनुर्धर काशिराज, महारथी शिखण्डी, धृष्टद्युम्न, विराट और अपराजित सात्यकि (भी)…”

“And Kāśya the supreme archer; and Śikhaṇḍin the great chariot-warrior; and Dhṛṣṭadyumna and Virāṭa; and Sātyaki, unconquered…”

यह पद्य अगले श्लोक (1.18) के साथ मिलकर शंख-ध्वनि करने वालों की सूची पूर्ण करता है; 1.17 में क्रिया (शंख बजाना) निहित है और 1.18 में स्पष्ट होती है।

काश्यःKāśya (the king of Kāśī)
काश्यः:
Karta
Rootकाश्य (प्रातिपदिक)
and
:
Root
परमेष्वासःthe supreme archer (excellent bowman)
परमेष्वासः:
Karta
Rootपरमेष्वास (प्रातिपदिक)
शिखण्डीŚikhaṇḍī
शिखण्डी:
Karta
Rootशिखण्डिन् (प्रातिपदिक)
and
:
Root
महारथःa great chariot-warrior
महारथः:
Karta
Rootमहारथ (प्रातिपदिक)
धृष्टद्युम्नःDhṛṣṭadyumna
धृष्टद्युम्नः:
Karta
Rootधृष्टद्युम्न (प्रातिपदिक)
विराटःVirāṭa
विराटः:
Karta
Rootविराट् (प्रातिपदिक)
and
:
Root
सात्यकिःSātyaki
सात्यकिः:
Karta
Rootसात्यकि (प्रातिपदिक)
and
:
Root
अपराजितःunconquered; undefeated
अपराजितः:
Karta
Rootअपराजित (प्रातिपदिक)
Sañjaya (narrator)
Heroic ideals (vīra)Reputation and epithetSocial role
Characterization through epithetsCoalition and alliesNarrative cataloging

FAQs

Epithets like “supreme archer” and “unconquered” function as confidence-language, reinforcing self-concept and group expectation.

No direct metaphysical claim is made; the verse operates at the level of narrative identity and social ideals.

This is part of a formal enumeration of notable allies on the Pāṇḍava side, preparing for the collective signal described in the next verse.

Shows how organizations use titles and recognitions to clarify expertise and encourage responsibility—ideally with ethical restraint.