Shloka 46
Draupadī’s Identification of the Pāṇḍavas and the Onset of the Chariot Engagement (द्रौपदी-पाण्डव-परिचयः)
गमनं मे न रुचितं तव तत्र कृतं च ते । “तात! तुम्हारे तपोवन जाते समय जैसा कि मैंने पहले ही कह दिया था, वही आज भी कह रहा हूँ। मुझे तुम्हारा वहाँ जाना अच्छा नहीं लगा और वहाँ जाकर तुमने जो कुछ किया, वह भी पसंद नहीं आया
gamanaṃ me na rucitaṃ tava tatra kṛtaṃ ca te |
Vaiśaṃpāyana sagte: „Ich billigte nicht, dass du dorthin gingst; und ebenso wenig billigte ich, was du tatest, nachdem du dort gewesen warst.“
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Educational Q&A
Ethical evaluation applies both to intentions/choices (the decision to go) and to subsequent actions (what was done there). A questionable end does not justify questionable means; conduct remains accountable.
The narrator Vaiśaṃpāyana reports a statement of disapproval directed at someone who went to a certain place and acted there; the speaker condemns both the journey and the deeds performed, signaling a breach of proper conduct.