Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 47

Jarā’s Account and the Enthronement of Jarāsandha (जरासंधोत्पत्तिः अभिषेकश्च)

नाहामि विषये राज्ञो वसन्ती पुत्रगृद्धिन: । बालं पुत्रमिमं हन्तुं धार्मिकस्य महात्मन:

nāhāmi viṣaye rājño vasantī putragṛddhinaḥ | bālaṃ putram imaṃ hantuṃ dhārmikasya mahātmanaḥ ||

„Da ich im Herrschaftsgebiet dieses Königs lebe und sein Verlangen nach einem Sohn sehe, halte ich es nicht für recht, dieses Kind zu töten—den jungen Sohn eines rechtschaffenen und edelmütigen Monarchen.“

not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
अहामिI kill / I would kill
अहामि:
TypeVerb
Rootहन्
FormLat (present indicative), 1, singular, Parasmaipada
विषयेin the realm/territory
विषये:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootविषय
Formmasculine, locative, singular
राज्ञःof the king
राज्ञः:
TypeNoun
Rootराजन्
Formmasculine, genitive, singular
वसन्तीdwelling (female), living
वसन्ती:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootवसन्ती
Formfeminine, nominative, singular
पुत्रगृद्धिनःof (one) eager/greedy for a son
पुत्रगृद्धिनः:
TypeAdjective
Rootपुत्रगृद्धि
Formmasculine, genitive, singular
बालम्young, a child
बालम्:
TypeAdjective
Rootबाल
Formmasculine, accusative, singular
पुत्रम्son
पुत्रम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootपुत्र
Formmasculine, accusative, singular
इमम्this
इमम्:
TypePronoun
Rootइदम्
Formmasculine, accusative, singular
हन्तुम्to kill
हन्तुम्:
TypeVerb
Rootहन्
Formtumun (infinitive)
धार्मिकस्यof the righteous
धार्मिकस्य:
TypeAdjective
Rootधार्मिक
Formmasculine, genitive, singular
महात्मनःof the great-souled one
महात्मनः:
TypeNoun
Rootमहात्मन्
Formmasculine, genitive, singular

श्रीकृष्ण उवाच

A
a king (rājā)
T
the king’s child/son (bāla putra)
A
a rākṣasī (implied by narrative context)
T
two queens (implied by narrative context)

Educational Q&A

Even one inclined to harm recognizes a boundary set by dharma: it is unethical to kill an innocent child, especially the offspring of a righteous king; moral restraint is upheld as a higher law than impulse.

A rākṣasī, living in the king’s realm, sees the king’s yearning for a son and the vulnerability of the child; she reasons that killing the boy would be improper and refrains, grounding her decision in the king’s righteousness and the ethical weight of the act.