आपद्-राजनीतिः (Āpad-rājanīti) — Policy Options in Multi-Front Crisis
राजोवाच कृशाकृशे मया बद्दान् गृहीते वचनात् तव । दुर्लभत्वं च तस्यैव वेदवाक्यमिव द्विज
rājovāca—kṛśākṛśe mayā baddhān gṛhīte vacanāt tava | durlabhatvaṃ ca tasyaiva vedavākyam iva dvija ||
قال الملك: «يا براهمن، لقد أدركتُ قولك إدراكًا راسخًا: من قُيِّد بالرجاء صار واهنًا، ومن غلب الرجاء صار قويًّا. وأيها المولودُ مرّتَين، فقد قبلتُ أيضًا—كأنها كلمةٌ ويدية—هذه النقطة منك: أن ما يُتَشوَّف إليه بالرجاء عسيرُ المنال غايةَ العسر.»
ऋषभ उवाच
Hope (āśā) functions like a bond: when one’s mind is tied to expectation, inner strength diminishes; when expectation is conquered, steadiness and vigor arise. Moreover, craving makes the desired object seem—and often become—harder to attain, because the mind’s dependence itself is a form of suffering and instability.
In a didactic dialogue within Śānti Parva, the king responds to a Brahmin sage’s instruction. He affirms that he has understood and accepted the teaching, treating the sage’s words as authoritative—comparable to a Vedic statement—especially regarding the weakening effect of hope and the rarity of what is intensely hoped for.