क्षुपदधीचिसंवादः — शिलादतपः, वरसीमा, मेघवाहनकल्पे त्रिदेवसमागमः
तदा तं कल्पमाहुर्वै मेघवाहनसंज्ञया हिरण्यगर्भस्तं दृष्ट्वा तस्य देहोद्भवस्तदा
tadā taṃ kalpamāhurvai meghavāhanasaṃjñayā hiraṇyagarbhastaṃ dṛṣṭvā tasya dehodbhavastadā
حينئذٍ سُمِّي ذلك الدهر حقًّا باسم «مِغَفاهَنَة» (Meghavāhana). وأمّا هِرَنياغَربْهَ (Hiraṇyagarbha)، أي براهما، فلمّا رآه وُلِد في تلك اللحظة من جسدِه، متجلّيًا كمبدأ الخلق تحت سيادة الربّ (Pati).
Suta Goswami (narrating to the sages of Naimisharanya)
By naming a specific kalpa and showing the creator (Hiraṇyagarbha) as a dependent manifestation, the verse supports Linga-worship’s core view: Pati (Shiva) is the source, while all creative functions arise under His sovereignty.
Shiva-tattva is implied as the transcendent cause from whom even Brahmā’s creative principle emerges—indicating the Lord as Pati beyond the kalpa-cycle, with creation appearing as His ordered manifestation.
The takeaway aligns with Pāśupata discipline: contemplate the kalpa as transient (pāśa) and anchor the pashu (soul) in devotion and inward worship of Pati (Shiva), the source beyond cyclic creation.