HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 1Shloka 8
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Arjuna Vishada Yoga, Shloka 8

Arjuna Vishada Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 8 illustration

भवान्भीष्मश्च कर्णश्च कृपश्च समितिंजयः । अश्वत्थामा विकर्णश्च सौमदत्तिस्तथैव च ॥

bhavān bhīṣmaś ca karṇaś ca kṛpaś ca samitiṃjayaḥ | aśvatthāmā vikarṇaś ca saumadattis tathaiva ca ||

You yourself, Bhīṣma, Karṇa, and Kṛpa—the conqueror in battle; Aśvatthāmā, Vikarṇa, and also the son of Somadatta.

You yourself, Bhīṣma, Karṇa, and Kṛpa, the victor in battle; Aśvatthāmā, Vikarṇa, and also the son of Somadatta.

You, and Bhīṣma, and Karṇa, and Kṛpa—conqueror in assemblies; Aśvatthāmā, Vikarṇa, and likewise Saumadatti.

‘samitiṃjayaḥ’ (“conqueror in battle/assemblies”) is sometimes attached specifically to Kṛpa or read more generally as an epithet in the list; punctuation and apposition differ across translators.

भवान्yourself (you, honorable one)
भवान्:
Karta
Rootभवत्
भीष्मःBhishma
भीष्मः:
Karta
Rootभीष्म
and
:
Root
कर्णःKarna
कर्णः:
Karta
Rootकर्ण
and
:
Root
कृपःKripa
कृपः:
Karta
Rootकृप
and
:
Root
समितिंजयःthe conqueror of the battle (victor in combat)
समितिंजयः:
Karta
Rootसमिति-जय
अश्वत्थामाAshvatthama
अश्वत्थामा:
Karta
Rootअश्वत्थामन्
विकर्णःVikarna
विकर्णः:
Karta
Rootविकर्ण
and
:
Root
सौमदत्तिःSaumadatti (son of Somadatta)
सौमदत्तिः:
Karta
Rootसौमदत्ति
तथाthus; likewise
तथा:
Rootतथा
एवindeed; just; also
एव:
Rootएव
and
:
Root
DuryodhanaDroṇa
Kīrti (reputation)Guru-śiṣya relations (Droṇa and Aśvatthāmā)Dharma (elders and authority)
Reliance on eminent eldersLegitimacy through renowned figuresIntergenerational authority

FAQs

Invoking celebrated figures serves as reassurance and persuasion: the speaker seeks confidence by anchoring his cause to widely respected authorities.

The prominence of elders foreshadows the Gītā’s ethical complexity: reverence for authority is meaningful, yet moral discernment cannot be outsourced to status alone.

This is the core of the Kaurava roster, highlighting iconic personalities whose presence heightens the gravity of the impending confrontation.

People often appeal to ‘big names’ to justify positions. The verse invites reflection on when authority is informative versus when it becomes a substitute for ethical reasoning.