Jabali Bound on the Banyan Tree and Nandayanti’s Appeal at Sri-Kantha on the Yamuna
मूढबुद्धे भवान् भ्राता ममासि त्वनयाप्लुतः भगिनी धर्मतस्ते ऽहं भवाञ्शिष्यः पितुर्मम
mūḍhabuddhe bhavān bhrātā mamāsi tvanayāplutaḥ bhaginī dharmataste 'haṃ bhavāñśiṣyaḥ piturmama
“噫,愚昧之人,你是我的兄长——由此亲缘,你被其所摄。依于达摩,我是你的姊妹;而你是我父亲的弟子。”
{ "primaryRasa": "raudra", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
It grounds the prohibition in two dharmic bonds: (1) a sibling relation (‘I am your sister by dharma’), and (2) a pedagogical hierarchy (‘you are my father’s disciple’), both of which bar erotic pursuit.
Dharmatas indicates a relationship recognized by social-religious law (ācāra/dharma), which may be biological or established through accepted norms (e.g., through the guru’s household being treated as kin). The verse emphasizes normative binding force rather than romance.
Purāṇic ethics often reinforce restraint through multiple overlapping duties. Even if one bond were disputed, the guru-śiṣya framework independently imposes strict boundaries, intensifying the moral correction of the king’s desire.