साम दैत्येषु नैवास्ति यतस्ते लब्धसंश्रयाः जातिधर्मेण वा भेद्या दानं प्राप्तश्रिये च किम् //
sāma daityeṣu naivāsti yataste labdhasaṃśrayāḥ jātidharmeṇa vā bhedyā dānaṃ prāptaśriye ca kim //
对代提耶(Daitya)而言,和解(sāma)本无用处,因为他们早已得其依怙与援助。若能凭其党同伐异之性与其族类之法(jāti-dharma)而使之离散,又何必以馈赠(dāna)施于已得富盛者?
This verse does not address Pralaya; it focuses on practical rajadharma—how a ruler should assess diplomacy and strategy toward hostile powers.
For a king, it advises realistic policy: avoid ineffective conciliation or bribery when the opponent is already entrenched and better handled through division of alliances and internal factions; for householders, it parallels discerning when gentle persuasion or material concessions will not reform a hardened wrongdoer.
No Vastu, temple-building, or ritual procedure is mentioned; the verse is purely about political counsel (nīti) within the Matsya Purana’s rajadharma material.