नारद–शुक संवादः
Impermanence, Svabhāva, and Śuka’s Resolve for Yoga
तथा वेद्यमवेद्यं च वेदविद्यो न विन्दति । स केवल मूढमतिर्ज्ञानभारवह: स्मृत:
tathā vedyam avedyaṃ ca vedavidyo na vindati | sa kevalaṃ mūḍhamatir jñānabhāravahaḥ smṛtaḥ ||
阎若婆迦说道:“同样,虽研习吠陀,却不能辨别何者真正可知、何者不应追逐为可知者,便不得真实理解。此人只被记作愚昧之辈——把知识当作负担来背负,而非化为引导行持与解脱的智慧。”
याज़्ञवल्क्य उवाच
Vedic study is not sufficient by itself; true wisdom requires discernment—knowing what is genuinely worth knowing (vedya) and what is not (avedya). Without this discrimination, learning becomes mere accumulation and does not transform character or lead toward liberation.
In the didactic setting of the Śānti Parva, Yājñavalkya instructs on the limits of rote scholarship. He critiques those who pride themselves on Vedic learning yet lack insight, portraying them as carrying knowledge like a weight rather than using it to realize truth and live dharmically.