नारद–शुक संवादः
Impermanence, Svabhāva, and Śuka’s Resolve for Yoga
पज्चविंशतिमं प्रश्न॑ पप्रच्छान्वीक्षिकी तदा । विश्वाविश्वं तथाश्चाश्वृं मित्र वरुणमेव च
pañcaviṁśatitamaṁ praśnaṁ papracchānvīkṣikī tadā | viśvāviśvaṁ tathā cāśvaṁ mitra varuṇam eva ca pṛthvīnātha |
耶若那伐迦说道:“随后他提出第二十五问,关乎理性探究之学(Ānvīkṣikī)。地之主宰啊!在问毕关于吠陀的二十四问之后,他又问道:‘何为viśvā(全体)?何为aviśva(非全体)?何为aśva(马)?何为an-aśva(非马)?何为密多罗(Mitra)?何为伐楼那(Varuṇa)?’”
याज़्ञवल्क्य उवाच
The verse frames a shift from purely Vedic questioning to Ānvīkṣikī—disciplined rational inquiry—by posing paired contrast-questions (all/not-all, horse/non-horse) and invoking Vedic deities (Mitra, Varuṇa). It highlights that understanding dharma and reality involves both scriptural tradition and careful conceptual analysis.
Yājñavalkya reports that, after a set of twenty-four questions about the Veda, the interlocutor raises the twenty-fifth question concerning Ānvīkṣikī and lists specific items to be defined or understood: viśvā, aviśva, aśva, non-aśva, and the deities Mitra and Varuṇa.