Adhyāya 241: Guṇa-sṛṣṭi, Kṣetrajña-sākṣitva, and Śama through Ātma-jñāna (गुणसृष्टिः, क्षेत्रज्ञसाक्षित्वं, शमः)
अस्ति धर्म इति प्रोक्त नास्तीत्यत्रैव यो वदेत् । तस्य पक्षस्य सदृशमिदं मम भवेद् व्यथा
asti dharma iti prokta nāstīty atraiva yo vadet | tasya pakṣasya sadṛśam idaṁ mama bhaved vyathā ||
毗湿摩说:“经典宣示:‘法(dharma)存在。’然而若有人就在此处断言:‘法不存在’,信奉者听闻此言所生的痛楚——那痛楚正与信奉者一方相应——同样地,这关于业与智孰高孰下的问题,也令我心中为之苦恼。”
भीष्म उवाच
Bhishma underscores that denying the existence of dharma contradicts authoritative teaching and causes deep moral-spiritual distress; he likens his own discomfort over debates on the hierarchy of action and knowledge to the pain a believer feels when dharma is negated.
In the Shanti Parva’s instructional setting, Bhishma is responding to a philosophical query; before addressing the issue of the relative status of karma (action) and vidyā/jñāna (knowledge), he remarks that such disputation troubles him much like hearing an outright denial of dharma.