Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 3

Adhyāya 241: Guṇa-sṛṣṭi, Kṣetrajña-sākṣitva, and Śama through Ātma-jñāna (गुणसृष्टिः, क्षेत्रज्ञसाक्षित्वं, शमः)

मैं इस विषयको सुनना चाहता हूँ, आप कृपापूर्वक मुझे यह बतावें। ये दोनों वचन एक दूसरेके विपरीत हैं, अतः प्रतिकूल परिणाम ही उत्पन्न कर सकते हैं ।।

bhīṣma uvāca | ity uktaḥ pratyuvācedaṃ parāśarāsutaḥ sutam | karmavidyāmayāv etau vyākhyāsyāmi kṣarākṣarī ||

毗湿摩说:话既说完,波罗沙罗之子毗耶娑便答复自己的儿子道:“孩子啊,这两条道路——以业行(karma)为本者与以智知(jñāna)为本者——依次是可坏与不可坏的。我现在就开始为你阐释它们。”

भीष्मःBhishma
भीष्मः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootभीष्म
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
उवाचsaid
उवाच:
TypeVerb
Rootवच्
FormPerfect, 3, Singular, Parasmaipada
इतिthus
इति:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootइति
उक्तःhaving been addressed / spoken to
उक्तः:
TypeAdjective
Rootवच्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular, kta (past passive participle)
प्रत्युवाचreplied
प्रत्युवाच:
TypeVerb
Rootवच्
FormPerfect, 3, Singular, Parasmaipada
इदम्this
इदम्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootइदम्
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
पराशर-सुतःthe son of Parashara (Vyasa)
पराशर-सुतः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootपराशर-सुत
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
सुतम्to the son (Shuka)
सुतम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootसुत
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
कर्म-विद्या-मयौconsisting of action and knowledge
कर्म-विद्या-मयौ:
TypeAdjective
Rootकर्म-विद्या-मय
FormMasculine, Nominative, Dual
एतौthese two
एतौ:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootएतद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Dual
व्याख्यास्यामिI shall explain
व्याख्यास्यामि:
TypeVerb
Rootव्याख्या + अस् (आ + √स्था/√अस् in causative usage is not applicable here; standard is √ख्या with vi-ā- prefix as denominative verb 'to explain')
FormFuture, 1, Singular, Parasmaipada
क्षर-अक्षरीperishable and imperishable
क्षर-अक्षरी:
TypeAdjective
Rootक्षर-अक्षरिन्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Dual

भीष्म उवाच

B
Bhishma
V
Vyasa (Parashara’s son)
S
Shuka (Vyasa’s son, implied by 'sutam' and the Hindi context)

Educational Q&A

The verse introduces a key distinction: the action-oriented discipline (karma) operates within the perishable realm (kṣara), while the knowledge-oriented discipline (jñāna) leads toward the imperishable (akṣara). Apparent contradictions in teachings are resolved by recognizing their different aims and results.

Bhishma reports that after a question is posed, Vyasa—identified as Parashara’s son—responds to his son (traditionally Shuka). Vyasa announces he will explain two seemingly opposed teachings by clarifying the two paths: karma-based and knowledge-based.