जनक-राज्ञः मौण्ड्य-परिव्रज्या-विवादः
Janaka’s Renunciation Questioned; Discourse on Dāna and Detachment
गृहस्थेभ्योडपि निर्मुक्ता गृहस्थानेव संश्रिता: । प्रभवं च प्रतिष्ठां च दान्ता विन्दन्त आसते
gṛhasthebhyo 'pi nirmuktā gṛhasthān eva saṃśritāḥ | prabhavaṃ ca pratiṣṭhāṃ ca dāntā vindanta āsate ||
纵然他们已从对居家者的依赖中解脱,却仍以居家之道为所归依。自制之人(dānta)得其应得的资生之源与安稳之立足之地,于是安住于寂然。
अजुन उवाच
The verse highlights the ethical centrality of the householder stage: even those who are personally detached and disciplined may still ‘resort to’ the gṛhastha framework, because it provides a legitimate foundation (prabhava) and stable support (pratiṣṭhā) for sustaining life and dharma.
Arjuna speaks about the status of disciplined persons in relation to the āśrama system, emphasizing that self-controlled individuals can remain established by relying on the householder order as a stabilizing base, even while being inwardly free from dependence.