Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 56

Daṇḍa as the Foundation of Social Order (दण्डप्रतिष्ठा)

अवध्य: सर्वभूतानामन्तरात्मा न संशय: । अवध्ये चात्मनि कथं वध्यो भवति कस्यचित्‌,समस्त प्राणियोंका अन्तरात्मा अवध्य है, इसमें संशय नहीं है। जब आत्माका वध हो ही नहीं सकता तब वह किसीका वध्य कैसे होगा?

avadhyaḥ sarvabhūtānām antarātmā na saṁśayaḥ | avadhye cātmani kathaṁ vadhyo bhavati kasyacit ||

阿周那说:“住于一切众生之内的内在自我,决不可杀——对此毫无疑问。若自我本不可侵、不可毁,又怎会在任何人面前成为‘可杀之物’呢?”

अवध्यःnot to be slain, inviolable
अवध्यः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootअवध्य (वध्य < √वध्)
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
सर्वभूतानाम्of all beings
सर्वभूतानाम्:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootसर्वभूत (सर्व + भूत)
FormNeuter, Genitive, Plural
अन्तरात्माthe inner Self
अन्तरात्मा:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootअन्तरात्मन्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
संशयःdoubt
संशयः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootसंशय
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
अवध्येin/with regard to (one that is) unslayable
अवध्ये:
Adhikarana
TypeAdjective
Rootअवध्य (वध्य < √वध्)
FormMasculine/Neuter, Locative, Singular
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
आत्मनिin the Self
आत्मनि:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootआत्मन्
FormMasculine, Locative, Singular
कथम्how?
कथम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootकथम्
वध्यःslayable, fit to be slain
वध्यः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootवध्य (√वध्)
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
भवतिbecomes/is
भवति:
TypeVerb
Root√भू
FormPresent, Third, Singular, Parasmaipada
कस्यचित्of anyone, of someone (at all)
कस्यचित्:
Sampradana
TypePronoun
Rootकस्यचित् (क + चित्)
FormMasculine/Neuter, Genitive, Singular

अजुन उवाच

A
Arjuna
A
antarātmā (the inner Self/Ātman)
S
sarvabhūta (all beings)

Educational Q&A

The verse asserts the inviolability of the Ātman (inner Self) present in all beings: since the Self cannot be slain, the notion of truly ‘killing’ the essential Self of anyone is philosophically incoherent. This frames ethical reflection on violence by distinguishing the perishable body from the imperishable Self.

Arjuna speaks, raising a philosophical objection: if the indwelling Self in all creatures is inherently unkillable, then in what sense can anyone be called a slayer or anyone else be called slain? He is probing the moral and metaphysical basis of harm and responsibility.