Shloka 13
Adhyātma-nirdeśa
Definition of Adhyātma): Mahābhūtas, Indriyas, Guṇas, and the Witness (Kṣetrajña
विहगैरुप भुक्तस्य शैलाग्रात्ू पतितस्य च । अग्निना चोपसयुक्तस्य कुत: संजीवनं पुनः
vihagair upabhuktasya śailāgrāt patitasya ca | agninā copasayuktasya kutaḥ saṃjīvanaṃ punaḥ ||
Người bị chim ăn thịt, hoặc rơi từ đỉnh núi mà tan nát, hoặc bị lửa thiêu rụi—làm sao có thể sống lại? Trong những cảnh ấy, lấy gì làm căn cứ cho sự hồi sinh?
भरद्वाज उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse articulates a skeptical challenge to the idea of returning to life after death by pointing to irreversible physical destruction. It sets up a philosophical inquiry into what ‘life’ or ‘self’ could mean beyond the body, and invites a response grounded in dharma, karma, and metaphysics rather than mere bodily continuity.
Bharadvāja raises an objection in a doctrinal discussion: if a body is destroyed—devoured by birds, smashed by a fall, or burned to ash—how can it be ‘revived’? The statement functions as a probing question meant to test or clarify teachings about post-mortem existence and rebirth.