Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 23

Nakula’s Counsel on Yajña, Dāna, and Tyāga (नकुलोपदेशः—यज्ञदानत्यागविचारः)

तत्‌ सम्प्राप्य गृहस्था ये पशुधान्यधनान्विता: । न यजन्ते महाराज शाश्रचतं तेषु किल्बिषम्‌

tat samprāpya gṛhasthā ye paśudhānyadhanānvitāḥ | na yajante mahārāja śāśvataṁ teṣu kilbiṣam ||

Nakula nói: “Tâu đại vương, những người gia chủ sau khi đạt được phú túc, đầy đủ gia súc, lương thực và của cải mà không cử hành tế lễ (yajña), thì mắc lỗi lâu dài; vết nhơ của tội nghiệp cứ bám lấy họ mãi.”

तत्that (thing/goal)
तत्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
Formneuter, accusative, singular
सम्प्राप्यhaving attained
सम्प्राप्य:
TypeVerb
Rootसम् + प्र + आप्
Formक्त्वा (absolutive/gerund), parasmaipada (usage-neutral for gerund)
गृहस्थाःhouseholders
गृहस्थाः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootगृहस्थ
Formmasculine, nominative, plural
येwho
ये:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootयद्
Formmasculine, nominative, plural
पशु-धान्य-धन-अन्विताःendowed with cattle, grain, and wealth
पशु-धान्य-धन-अन्विताः:
TypeAdjective
Rootअन्वित
Formmasculine, nominative, plural
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
यजन्तेthey perform sacrifice / they worship
यजन्ते:
TypeVerb
Rootयज्
Formpresent (lat), ātmanepada, third, plural
महा-राजO great king
महा-राज:
TypeNoun
Rootमहाराज
Formmasculine, vocative, singular
शाश्वतम्everlasting / constant
शाश्वतम्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootशाश्वत
Formneuter, accusative, singular
तेषुin them / among them
तेषु:
Adhikarana
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
Formmasculine, locative, plural
किल्बिषम्sin / demerit
किल्बिषम्:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootकिल्बिष
Formneuter, nominative, singular

नकुल उवाच

N
Nakula
M
Mahārāja (the king addressed)

Educational Q&A

Prosperity brings obligation: a householder who has gained resources (cattle, grain, wealth) should uphold dharma through yajña—understood as sacrificial duty, offering, and responsible giving; neglecting this incurs lasting moral fault (kilbiṣa).

Nakula addresses the king and states a normative rule of conduct for householders: once they attain material means, they should perform yajña; failure to do so is described as an enduring ethical blemish.