Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 46

वैशम्पायन उवाच एवं ते पुरुषव्याप्रा: सर्वे व्यायतबाहव: । प्रतिज्ञा बहुला: कृत्वा धृतराष्ट्रमुपागमन्‌

vaiśampāyana uvāca evaṁ te puruṣavyāprāḥ sarve vyāyatabāhavaḥ | pratijñā bahulāḥ kṛtvā dhṛtarāṣṭram upāgaman ||

Vaiśampāyana nói: “Tâu đại vương, như thế, những bậc trượng phu tựa sư tử ấy—tất thảy các Pāṇḍava, cánh tay lực lưỡng, hành động quả quyết—sau khi lập nhiều lời thệ nguyện, đã đến yết kiến vua Dhṛtarāṣṭra.”

वैशम्पायनःVaiśampāyana
वैशम्पायनः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootवैशम्पायन
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
उवाचsaid
उवाच:
TypeVerb
Rootवच्
FormPerfect, 3rd, Singular, Parasmaipada
एवम्thus
एवम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootएवम्
तेthey / those
ते:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
पुरुषव्याघ्राःtigers among men (great heroes)
पुरुषव्याघ्राः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootपुरुषव्याघ्र
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
सर्वेall
सर्वे:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootसर्व
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
व्यायतबाहवःhaving long/extended arms (mighty-armed)
व्यायतबाहवः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootव्यायतबाहु
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
प्रतिज्ञाःvows, promises
प्रतिज्ञाः:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootप्रतिज्ञा
FormFeminine, Accusative, Plural
बहुलाःmany, numerous
बहुलाः:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootबहुल
FormFeminine, Accusative, Plural
कृत्वाhaving made / having taken (vows)
कृत्वा:
TypeVerb
Rootकृ
Formक्त्वा (absolutive/gerund), Parasmaipada (usage)
धृतराष्ट्रम्Dhṛtarāṣṭra
धृतराष्ट्रम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootधृतराष्ट्र
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
उपागमन्approached, went to
उपागमन्:
TypeVerb
Rootउप-गम्
FormImperfect, 3rd, Plural, Parasmaipada

वैशम्पायन उवाच

V
Vaiśampāyana
P
Pāṇḍavas
D
Dhṛtarāṣṭra

Educational Q&A

The verse highlights the moral weight of pratijñā (solemn vows): righteous agents bind themselves by promises and then act accordingly, approaching authority not merely with power but with accountable resolve.

After making multiple vows, the strong-armed Pāṇḍavas proceed to King Dhṛtarāṣṭra, indicating a formal approach to the Kuru court and the next step in the unfolding political-ethical conflict.