Sabhā-praveśa, Dāna, and the Courtly Convergence (सभा-प्रवेशः दानं च)
सुकर्मा चेकितानश्व पुरुश्चामित्रकर्शन: । केतुमान् वसुदानश्च वैदेहो&थ कृतक्षण:
sukarmā cekitānaśva puruścāmitrakarśanaḥ | ketumān vasudānaśca vaideho ’tha kṛtakṣaṇaḥ ||
Vaiśampāyana nói: “Cũng có Sukarmā, Cekitānaśva và Puru—lừng danh là kẻ nghiền nát quân thù; lại có Ketumān và Vasudāna; rồi đến vương tử Videha là Kṛtakṣaṇa.”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Though primarily a catalogue of names, the verse highlights how large political enterprises are sustained by networks of rulers and reputations; ethical accountability in epic narrative is not isolated to one hero but shared across allied leaders who lend support to contested power.
Vaiśampāyana continues enumerating prominent kings/warriors present or aligned in the Sabha Parva context, naming Sukarmā, Cekitānaśva, Puru (called ‘amitrakarśana’), Ketumān, Vasudāna, and the Videha prince Kṛtakṣaṇa as part of the assembled or referenced political-military landscape.