Shloka 15
Uttarā-vilāpaḥ and Kṛṣṇasya satya-vacanenābhi-mañyu-jasyābhijīvanam
Uttarā’s Lament and the Revival of Abhimanyu’s Son by Krishna’s Truth-Act
अजानतीमिषीकेयं जनित्रीं हन्त्विति प्रभो | अहमेव विनष्टा स्यां नैतदेवंगते भवेत्
ajānatīm iṣīkeyaṁ janitrīṁ hantv iti prabho | aham eva vinaṣṭā syāṁ naitad evaṁgate bhavet ||
Vaiśampāyana nói: “Muôn tâu chúa thượng, hỡi Puṇḍarīkākṣa! Nếu Dharmarāja, hay bậc Bhīmasena cao quý, hoặc chính ngài đã nói: ‘Hãy để mũi iṣīkā này đánh chết người mẹ vô tri của đứa trẻ, thay vì đứa bé,’ thì chỉ một mình ta phải chết; trong cảnh ấy, tai ương này đã chẳng xảy ra.”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Educational Q&A
Even a seemingly small directive—especially from revered authorities—can carry grave moral weight. The verse highlights ethical restraint: do not redirect violence onto an innocent, and recognize that a single wrongful command can trigger wider calamity beyond the immediate victim.
A speaker addresses Kṛṣṇa (Puṇḍarīkākṣa), reflecting on a hypothetical command: if Yudhiṣṭhira, Bhīma, or Kṛṣṇa had ordered the iṣīkā to kill the boy’s unaware mother instead of the child, then only the speaker would have suffered, and the larger misfortune would have been avoided. The passage frames a moral counterfactual about blame, authority, and the spread of harm.