Shloka 17

Śṛṅgī’s Curse on King Parikṣit

Parikṣit–Śṛṅgī–Takṣaka Causal Link

Devanagari script

त॑ गत्वा दशतां कश्चिद्‌ भुजड़: स मरिष्यति । तस्मिन्‌ मृते यज्ञकारे क्रतु:ः स न भविष्यति

Transliteration

taṁ gatvā daśatāṁ kaścid bhujaṅgaḥ sa mariṣyati | tasmin mṛte yajñakāre kratuḥ sa na bhaviṣyati ||

Translation

Śeṣa nói: “Hãy để một con rắn đến cắn hắn; hắn sẽ chết. Khi vị tư tế hành lễ ấy đã chết, nghi lễ tế tự sẽ không thể tiếp tục—quả thật, lễ tế sẽ phải dừng lại.”

Word by Word

• {'taṁ': 'him (accusative singular)', 'gatvā': 'having gone (absolutive of √gam)', 'daśatām': 'let (him) be bitten

• optative/imperative sense from √daś ‘to bite’', 'kaścit': 'someone, some (indefinite pronoun)', 'bhujaṅgaḥ': 'serpent, snake', 'sa': 'he', 'mariṣyati': 'will die (future of √mṛ)', 'tasmin': 'when/while he (is so)

• in that case (locative absolute context)', 'mṛte': 'dead

• when (he is) dead (locative absolute of √mṛ)', 'yajñakāre': 'in/with the sacrificer or officiant

• the one who conducts the sacrifice', 'kratuḥ': 'sacrificial rite

• sacrifice (also ‘resolve/energy’ in other contexts)', 'na': 'not', 'bhaviṣyati': 'will be

Speaker

शेष उवाच

Characters & Entities

• Śeṣa
• serpent (bhujaṅga)
• yajñakāra (officiating priest/sacrificer)
• kratu (sacrifice/rite)

Educational Q&A

What is the core teaching?

The verse highlights the dependence of ritual action on competent human agency: when the knowledgeable officiant is removed, the rite collapses. Ethically, it also exposes a darker logic—seeking to end a feared or harmful enterprise by targeting its enabler—inviting reflection on means versus ends (dharma versus expediency).

What is happening in the narrative?

Śeṣa proposes a concrete countermeasure: have a serpent bite and kill the priest who is conducting (or will conduct) the sacrifice; once the yajñakāra dies, the kratu (sacrificial performance) cannot continue and will cease.