HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 3Shloka 6
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 6

Karma YogaKarma Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 6 illustration

कर्मेन्द्रियाणि संयम्य य आस्ते मनसा स्मरन् । इन्द्रियार्थान्विमूढात्मा मिथ्याचारः स उच्यते ॥ ३.६ ॥

karmendriyāṇi saṃyamya ya āste manasā smaran | indriyārthān vimūḍhātmā mithyācāraḥ sa ucyate || 3.6 ||

Kẻ kiềm chế các cơ quan hành động mà ngồi, trong tâm vẫn tưởng nhớ các đối tượng của giác quan—người ấy, tự ngã mê lầm, được gọi là kẻ giả dối, hành xử hư ngụy.

One who restrains the organs of action but sits dwelling in the mind on sense-objects—such a deluded person is called a hypocrite.

Restraining the organs of action, the one who remains (inactive) while mentally recalling sense-objects—such a person, of confused self-understanding, is said to be of false conduct.

‘Mithyācāra’ is often rendered ‘hypocrite,’ but more literally denotes ‘false/inauthentic practice.’ The emphasis is on inner consistency: external restraint without cognitive-emotional transformation is incomplete.

कर्मेन्द्रियाणिthe organs of action
कर्मेन्द्रियाणि:
Karma
Rootकर्मेन्द्रिय (कर्म + इन्द्रिय)
संयम्यhaving restrained
संयम्य:
Root√यम् (सम्-यम्)
यःwho
यः:
Karta
Rootयद्
आस्तेsits; remains
आस्ते:
Root√आस्
मनसाby the mind; with the mind
मनसा:
Karana
Rootमनस्
स्मरन्remembering; dwelling on
स्मरन्:
Root√स्मृ
इन्द्रियार्थान्the objects of the senses
इन्द्रियार्थान्:
Karma
Rootइन्द्रियार्थ (इन्द्रिय + अर्थ)
विमूढात्माone whose self is deluded
विमूढात्मा:
Karta
Rootविमूढात्मन् (वि + मूढ + आत्मन्)
मिथ्याचारःa hypocrite; one of false conduct
मिथ्याचारः:
Karta
Rootमिथ्याचार (मिथ्या + आचार)
सःhe
सः:
Karta
Rootतद्
उच्यतेis called; is said to be
उच्यते:
Root√वच्
KrishnaArjuna
IndriyasManasSelf-disciplineAttachmentEthical authenticity
Inner-outer congruenceCritique of superficial asceticismMental fixation as bondage

FAQs

The verse identifies a split between outward behavior and inward preoccupation. It suggests that sustainable self-control requires working with attention and desire, not only suppressing behavior.

It implies that bondage is maintained at the level of identification and craving; mere physical restraint does not dissolve the underlying dispositions (saṃskāras) that perpetuate cyclic patterns.

Krishna cautions Arjuna against equating renunciation with simply not acting; the quality of mind and motive is central to the Gītā’s account of discipline.

In ethics and self-improvement, performative restraint (appearing disciplined) can coexist with compulsive attention to the very things one claims to renounce. The verse recommends integrity: align habits, intentions, and attention-training.