HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 3Shloka 1
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Karma Yoga, Shloka 1

Karma Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 1 illustration

अर्जुन उवाच । ज्यायसी चेत्कर्मणस्ते मता बुद्धिर्जनार्दन तत्किं कर्मणि घोरे मां नियोजयसि केशव ॥ ३.१ ॥

arjuna uvāca | jyāyasī cet karmaṇas te matā buddhir janārdana tat kiṁ karmaṇi ghore māṁ niyojayasi keśava || 3.1 ||

Arjuna nói: Nếu Ngài cho rằng trí tuệ (buddhi) cao hơn hành động, hỡi Janārdana, vậy vì sao Ngài lại thúc giục con dấn thân vào hành động khốc liệt này, hỡi Keśava?

Arjuna said: If You consider knowledge (buddhi) superior to action, O Janārdana, then why do You urge me to engage in this difficult action, O Keśava?

Arjuna said: If, in your view, understanding is better than action, O Janārdana, then why do you enjoin me upon such arduous action, O Keśava?

Karmaṇi ghore is commonly rendered ‘terrible’ or ‘dreadful’; in context it can be read as ‘formidable/arduous duty’ within a martial-social setting, or more broadly as demanding ethical action under pressure.

अर्जुनःArjuna
अर्जुनः:
Karta
Rootअर्जुन
उवाचsaid
उवाच:
Root√वच्
ज्यायसीsuperior (higher)
ज्यायसी:
Rootज्यायस्
चेत्if
चेत्:
Rootचेत्
कर्मणःof action
कर्मणः:
Rootकर्मन्
तेyour
ते:
Rootयुष्मद्
मताconsidered; held (to be)
मता:
Root√मन् (मत)
बुद्धिःintellect; understanding
बुद्धिः:
Karta
Rootबुद्धि
जनार्दनO Janārdana
जनार्दन:
Rootजनार्दन
तत्then; that
तत्:
Rootतद्
किम्why? what?
किम्:
Rootकिम्
कर्मणिin action; in the act
कर्मणि:
Adhikarana
Rootकर्मन्
घोरेterrible; dreadful
घोरे:
Rootघोर
माम्me
माम्:
Karma
Rootअस्मद्
नियोजयसिyou engage; you impel; you enjoin
नियोजयसि:
Root√युज् (नि-युज्)
केशवO Keśava
केशव:
Rootकेशव
Arjuna
KarmaBuddhiŚreyas (the good)Dharma
Tension between contemplation and actionEthical duty under strainClarification request

FAQs

Arjuna articulates cognitive dissonance: he hears praise of inner wisdom yet faces a demanding obligation, prompting a need for an integrated framework.

The question sets up the Gītā’s synthesis: insight is not necessarily opposed to action; later verses argue for action informed by non-attachment and right understanding.

This opens Chapter 3 by challenging the apparent hierarchy implied in Chapter 2, pressing Krishna to reconcile jñāna-oriented teaching with prescribed duty.

It parallels dilemmas where reflective ideals seem to conflict with practical responsibilities—e.g., whether to withdraw or to act in complex social situations.