HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 1Shloka 26
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Arjuna Vishada Yoga, Shloka 26

Arjuna Vishada Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 26 illustration

तत्रापश्यत्स्थितान्पार्थः पितॄनथ पितामहान् । आचार्यान्मातुलान्भ्रातॄन्पुत्रान्पौत्रान्सखींस्तथा ॥ १.२६ ॥

tatrāpaśyat sthitān pārthaḥ pitṝn atha pitāmahān | ācāryān mātulān bhrātṝn putrān pautrān sakhīṁs tathā || 1.26 ||

Tại đó, Pārtha thấy đứng đối diện: cha và ông nội; các bậc thầy; các cậu (bên ngoại); anh em; con trai; cháu nội; và cả bằng hữu nữa.

There Pārtha saw stationed fathers and grandfathers, teachers, maternal uncles, brothers, sons, grandsons, and friends as well.

There Pārtha saw standing: fathers, grandfathers, teachers, maternal uncles, brothers, sons, grandsons, and also friends.

Some recensions continue the list into the next verse(s); the present verse is a catalog of relations, central to the ethical tension. The academic translation maintains the enumerative structure.

तत्रthere (in that place)
तत्र:
Adhikarana
Rootतत्र
अपश्यत्saw
अपश्यत्:
Root√पश् (दृश्)
स्थितान्standing, stationed
स्थितान्:
Karma
Root√स्था
पार्थःPartha (Arjuna, son of Pṛthā)
पार्थः:
Karta
Rootपार्थ
पितॄन्fathers
पितॄन्:
Karma
Rootपितृ
अथand then; also
अथ:
Rootअथ
पितामहान्grandfathers
पितामहान्:
Karma
Rootपितामह
आचार्यान्teachers, preceptors
आचार्यान्:
Karma
Rootआचार्य
मातुलान्maternal uncles
मातुलान्:
Karma
Rootमातुल
भ्रातॄन्brothers
भ्रातॄन्:
Karma
Rootभ्रातृ
पुत्रान्sons
पुत्रान्:
Karma
Rootपुत्र
पौत्रान्grandsons
पौत्रान्:
Karma
Rootपौत्र
सखीन्friends
सखीन्:
Karma
Rootसखि
तथाlikewise; also
तथा:
Rootतथा
Sanjaya (narration)
DharmaKinship obligationsCompassion (dayā/kṛpā)
Relational conflictMoral dilemmaHuman cost of duty

FAQs

Recognition of close relations triggers empathic distress and role-conflict: Arjuna’s warrior duty collides with familial and social bonds.

The catalog can symbolize the many identities the self inhabits (son, student, friend), which later teachings interrogate in light of a deeper self-understanding.

This recognition scene is the narrative hinge: Arjuna’s crisis becomes intelligible as a conflict between dharma and attachment.

Ethical decisions often involve multiple roles and relationships; acknowledging them explicitly helps clarify what is at stake.