Shukra’s Curse on King Danda and Prahlada’s Counsel to Andhaka on Dharma
हयग्रीवः कालनेमिः संह्लादः कालनाशनः शरभः शलभश्चैव विप्रचित्तिश्च वीर्यवान्
hayagrīvaḥ kālanemiḥ saṃhlādaḥ kālanāśanaḥ śarabhaḥ śalabhaścaiva vipracittiśca vīryavān
اور (ان میں) ہَیَگریو، کالنیمی، سَمہلاد، کالناشن، شَرَبھ، شَلَبھ اور زورآور وِپرچِتّی بھی تھے۔
{ "primaryRasa": "vira", "secondaryRasa": "raudra", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
No. In many Purāṇic corpora “Hayagrīva” can denote either a demon or a divine manifestation depending on context. Here it appears in a daitya roster opposing Śiva, so it should be read as an asura named Hayagrīva.
Certain names function in multiple registers: Śarabha can be a mythic creature and also a Śaiva-associated epithet in other narratives. This verse uses it as a warrior-name within an asura list, illustrating how Purāṇic onomastics can cross sectarian story-worlds.
It highlights Vipracitti’s exceptional martial potency and signals his prominence among the coalition. Such epithets help listeners recognize hierarchy within a compressed catalogue.