Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 3

Ātma-saṃyama-dharma: One-pointedness of Mind and Senses (शुक–व्यास संवादः)

वेदे वचनमुक्तं तु कुरु कर्म त्यजेति च । कथमेतद्‌ विजानीयां तच्च व्याख्यातुमरहसि,वेदमें “कर्म करो” और “कर्म छोड़ो'--ये दोनों बातें कही गयी हैं। मैं इनका तात्पर्य कैसे समझूँ? जिससे इनका विरोध हट जाय। आप इस विषयकी व्याख्या करें

vede vacanam uktaṃ tu kuru karma tyajeti ca | katham etad vijānīyāṃ tac ca vyākhyātum arhasi ||

وید میں ‘کرم کرو’ اور ‘کرم چھوڑ دو’—یہ دونوں باتیں کہی گئی ہیں۔ میں ان کا مطلب کیسے سمجھوں کہ یہ ظاہری تضاد دور ہو جائے؟ آپ اس کی تشریح فرمائیں۔

वेदेin the Veda
वेदे:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootवेद
FormMasculine, Locative, Singular
वचनम्a statement/utterance
वचनम्:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootवचन
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular
उक्तम्said/uttered
उक्तम्:
TypeVerb
Rootवच्
Formक्त (past passive participle), Neuter, Nominative, Singular
तुbut/indeed
तु:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootतु
कुरुdo (you)
कुरु:
TypeVerb
Rootकृ
Formलोट् (imperative), Second, Singular, Parasmaipada
कर्मaction/duty/ritual act
कर्म:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootकर्मन्
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
त्यजabandon (you)
त्यज:
TypeVerb
Rootत्यज्
Formलोट् (imperative), Second, Singular, Parasmaipada
इतिthus (quotative)
इति:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootइति
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
कथम्how?
कथम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootकथम्
एतत्this (matter)
एतत्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootएतद्
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
विजानीयाम्may I understand/know clearly
विजानीयाम्:
TypeVerb
Rootज्ञा
Formविधिलिङ् (optative), First, Singular, Parasmaipada, वि
तत्that (matter)
तत्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
व्याख्यातुम्to explain
व्याख्यातुम्:
TypeVerb
Rootव्याख्या
Formतुमुन् (infinitive)
अरहसिyou are able/you ought
अरहसि:
TypeVerb
Rootअर्ह्
Formलट् (present), Second, Singular, Parasmaipada

शुक उवाच

Ś
Śuka
V
Veda

Educational Q&A

The verse frames a classic interpretive problem: the Veda appears to command both engagement in duty (karma) and renunciation (tyāga). Śuka asks for a principled explanation that reconciles these teachings rather than treating them as mutually exclusive.

Śuka, as the speaker, poses a doctrinal question to a teacher/elder in the Śānti Parva discourse setting, requesting clarification on how to understand seemingly opposing Vedic directives about action and renunciation.