Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 27

Śrī–Indra–Bali Saṃvāda: The Departure and Fourfold Placement of Lakṣmī

प्रत्यक्ष होतयोमूलं कृतान्तौतिहयोरपि । प्रत्यक्षेणागमो भिन्न: कृतान्तो वा न किउड्चन,अनुमान और आगम--इन दोनों प्रमाणोंका मूल प्रत्यक्ष प्रमाण है। आगम या अनुमान यदि प्रत्यक्ष अनुभवके विरुद्ध है तो वह कुछ भी नहीं है--उसकी प्रामाणिकता नहीं स्वीकार की जा सकती

pratyakṣaṃ hetumūlaṃ kṛtāntautihayor api | pratyakṣeṇāgamo bhinnaḥ kṛtānto vā na kiñcana ||

بھیشم نے کہا—قیاس (انُمان) اور شاستری روایت (آگم)—دونوں کی جڑ براہِ راست ادراک (پرتیکش) ہے۔ اگر کوئی منقول تعلیم یا قیاس، براہِ راست تجربے کے خلاف ہو تو وہ کچھ بھی نہیں؛ اس کی حجیت قبول نہیں کی جا سکتی۔

प्रत्यक्षम्direct perception
प्रत्यक्षम्:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootप्रत्यक्ष
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular
होतयोःof the two (kinds of) invokers/priests
होतयोः:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootहोतु
FormMasculine, Genitive, Dual
मूलम्root, basis
मूलम्:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootमूल
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular
कृतान्तयोःof the two (kinds of) conclusions/determinations
कृतान्तयोः:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootकृतान्त
FormMasculine, Genitive, Dual
इहयोःhere (in this context)
इहयोः:
Adhikarana
TypeIndeclinable
Rootइह
अपिalso, even
अपि:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootअपि
प्रत्यक्षेणby direct perception
प्रत्यक्षेण:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootप्रत्यक्ष
FormNeuter, Instrumental, Singular
आगमःscriptural testimony/tradition
आगमः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootआगम
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
भिन्नःdivergent, opposed
भिन्नः:
TypeAdjective
Rootभिन्न
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
कृतान्तःconclusion/determination
कृतान्तः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootकृतान्त
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
वाor
वा:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootवा
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
किञ्चनanything at all
किञ्चन:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootकिञ्चन

भीष्म उवाच

B
Bhīṣma

Educational Q&A

Bhīṣma teaches a hierarchy of knowledge-sources: direct perception is foundational, and inference or scriptural testimony must not contradict lived, direct experience; if they do, their authority is to be rejected.

In the Śānti Parva’s instruction on dharma and right understanding, Bhīṣma lays down an epistemic rule for ethical discernment: reasoning and tradition are valuable, but they must be anchored in and consistent with direct perception.