Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 65

आपद्धर्मनिर्णयः — विश्वामित्र-श्वपचसंवादः

Apaddharma Determination: Dialogue of Viśvāmitra and the Śvapaca

अथ सुत्याद्ठतं श्रुत्वा तस्य शत्रोर्विचक्षण: । हेतुमद्‌ ग्रहणीयार्थ मार्जारो वाक्यमब्रवीत्‌,अपने उस शत्रुका यह युक्तियुक्त और मान लेने योग्य सुन्दर भाषण सुनकर बुद्धिमान्‌ बिलाव कुछ बोलनेको उद्यत हुआ

atha sūtyād dhṛtaṃ śrutvā tasya śatror vicakṣaṇaḥ | hetumad grahaṇīyārthaṃ mārjāro vākyam abravīt ||

پھر اپنے دشمن کی وہ دلیل آمیز اور قابلِ قبول بات سن کر اور اس کا مفہوم سمجھ کر، زیرک بلی جواب دینے کے لیے آمادہ ہوئی اور بولی۔

अथthen
अथ:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootअथ
सुत्यात्from the Soma-pressing/pressing (rite)
सुत्यात्:
Apadana
TypeNoun
Rootसुति
FormFeminine, Ablative, Singular
उत्थितम्arisen, produced
उत्थितम्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootउत्थित
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
श्रुत्वाhaving heard
श्रुत्वा:
TypeVerb
Rootश्रु
FormAbsolutive (Gerund)
तस्यof that (one), his
तस्य:
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormMasculine/Neuter, Genitive, Singular
शत्रोःof the enemy
शत्रोः:
TypeNoun
Rootशत्रु
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular
विचक्षणःwise, discerning
विचक्षणः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootविचक्षण
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
हेतुमत्reasoned, well-grounded
हेतुमत्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootहेतुमत्
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
ग्रहणीयार्थम्having a meaning fit to be accepted
ग्रहणीयार्थम्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootग्रहणीयार्थ
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
मार्जारःthe cat
मार्जारः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootमार्जार
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
वाक्यम्speech, words
वाक्यम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootवाक्य
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
अब्रवीत्said, spoke
अब्रवीत्:
TypeVerb
Rootब्रू
FormImperfect (Lan), 3rd, Singular

भीष्म उवाच

M
mārjāra (the cat)
Ś
śatru (the enemy, unnamed)

Educational Q&A

One should evaluate speech by its reasoning and ethical soundness, not merely by the speaker’s identity; even an enemy’s words can be worthy of acceptance if they are hetumat (rational) and grahaṇīya (fit to be adopted).

A discerning cat hears an enemy’s well-argued statement, recognizes its meaningful and acceptable nature, and then begins to reply—signaling a shift from mere hostility to reasoned engagement.