अध्याय १ — न्यग्रोधवनोपवेशनम् तथा द्रौणिनिश्चयः
Night at the Banyan and Drauṇi’s Resolve
तं जना बहु मन्यन्ते ये च शास्त्रविशारदा: । “यदि छलसे काम लूँ तो अवश्य मेरे अभीष्ट मनोरथकी सिद्धि हो सकती है। शत्रुओंका महान् संहार भी तभी सम्भव होगा। जहाँ सिद्धि मिलनेमें संदेह हो, उसकी अपेक्षा उस उपायका अवलम्बन करना उत्तम है, जिसमें संशयके लिये स्थान न हो। साधारण लोग तथा शास्त्रज्ञ पुछष भी उसीका अधिक आदर करते हैं ।। यच्चाप्यत्र भवेद् वाच्यं गर्हितं लोकनिन्दितम्
taṁ janā bahu manyante ye ca śāstraviśāradāḥ | yadi chalase kāma lūṁ to avaśya mama abhīṣṭa-manorathasya siddhiḥ śakyā | śatrūṇāṁ mahān saṁhāro 'pi tadaiva sambhavaḥ | yatra siddhi-lābhe saṁśayaḥ syāt, tasyāpekṣayā tad-upāyasyāvalambanaṁ śreyaḥ yatra saṁśayāya sthānaṁ na syāt | sādhāraṇā janāḥ śāstrajñāś ca tam eva adhikaṁ ādaraṁ kurvanti || yac cāpy atra bhaved vācyaṁ garhitaṁ lokaninditam
Sañjaya said: “Many people, including those well-versed in the treatises, hold this view: ‘If I resort to deception to accomplish my aim, my desired purpose can certainly be achieved. Only then can a great slaughter of the enemies be brought about. When there is doubt about attaining success, it is better to adopt that means in which there is no room for uncertainty. Ordinary people and learned authorities alike show greater respect for such a course.’ And yet, in this matter, whatever may be said that is blameworthy and condemned by the world…
संजय उवाच
The verse highlights a tension between pragmatic success and moral legitimacy: many—both common people and learned authorities—may endorse a sure means to victory (even deception), yet such speech or conduct can still be blameworthy and socially condemned. It frames the ethical problem of choosing effective strategy versus righteous conduct.
Sañjaya reports a line of reasoning that justifies adopting deception as a reliable strategy to achieve one’s objective and destroy enemies, emphasizing certainty of success. The verse then pivots toward the counterpoint—acknowledging that what is said or done here may be censured and condemned—setting up the moral scrutiny surrounding the actions in the Sauptika episode.