Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 25

आभ्यन्तरध्यान-तत्त्वगणना-चतुर्व्यूहयोगः

Adhyaya 28

सुनिष्ठेत्यत्र कथिता रुद्रं रौद्री न संशयः ऐन्द्री चेन्द्रे तथा सौम्या सोमे नारायणे तथा

suniṣṭhetyatra kathitā rudraṃ raudrī na saṃśayaḥ aindrī cendre tathā saumyā some nārāyaṇe tathā

یہاں ‘سُنِشٹھا’ کا لقب رُدر کے حوالے سے کہا گیا ہے—وہ بے شک رَودری (رُدرانی) ہے۔ اسی طرح ‘آیندری’ اندر سے، ‘سَومیا’ سوم سے، اور اسی انداز سے نارائن کے حوالے سے بھی کہا جاتا ہے۔

suniṣṭhāthe well-established/firmly devoted (name/epithet)
suniṣṭhā:
atrahere, in this context
atra:
kathitāis stated/declared
kathitā:
rudramwith regard to Rudra
rudram:
raudrī (rudrāṇī)the Shakti/power of Rudra, the Rudra-consort aspect
raudrī (rudrāṇī):
na saṃśayaḥno doubt
na saṃśayaḥ:
aindrībelonging to/associated with Indra (Indra’s Shakti)
aindrī:
cendre (indre)in relation to Indra
cendre (indre):
tathālikewise
tathā:
saumyābelonging to Soma, gentle/lunar (Soma’s Shakti)
saumyā:
somein relation to Soma
some:
nārāyaṇein relation to Nārāyaṇa (Viṣṇu)
nārāyaṇe:
tathāsimilarly/also
tathā:

Suta Goswami (narrating to the sages of Naimisharanya)

R
Rudra
R
Raudri (Rudrani/Shakti)
I
Indra
S
Soma
N
Narayana (Vishnu)

FAQs

It teaches a key Linga Purana hermeneutic: many divine names and powers (Shaktis) are read as correspondences, ultimately grounding worship in Rudra-Shiva as Pati, with other devata-relations understood as functional aspects.

By affirming “Raudri” as certainly belonging to Rudra and then mapping other devata-relations, it implies Shiva-tattva as the integrating Lord-principle in whom diverse divine functions and their Shaktis are gathered and interpreted.

The practical takeaway is devotional and contemplative: in japa or sahasranama-style recitation, the sādhaka meditates on devata-names as Shiva’s operative powers, reducing pasha-bound multiplicity into Pati-centered unity.