HomeChanakya NitiCh. 14Shloka 9
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Chanakya Niti — Governance and Policy, Shloka 9

दूरस्थोऽपि न दूरस्थो यो यस्य मनसि स्थितः ।

यो यस्य हृदये नास्ति समीपस्थोऽपि दूरतः ॥

dūrastho'pi na dūrastho yo yasya manasi sthitaḥ |

yo yasya hṛdaye nāsti samīpastho'pi dūrataḥ ||

جو کسی کے ذہن میں بسا ہو وہ دور ہو کر بھی دور نہیں؛ اور جو کسی کے دل میں نہ ہو وہ قریب ہو کر بھی دور ہی ہے۔

दूरस्थःstanding far away/distant
दूरस्थः:
TypeAdjective
Rootदूरस्थ
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
अपिeven
अपि:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootअपि
FormAvyaya
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
FormAvyaya
दूरस्थःdistant
दूरस्थः:
TypeAdjective
Rootदूरस्थ
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
यःwho
यः:
TypePronoun
Rootयद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
यस्यof whom/whose
यस्य:
TypePronoun
Rootयद्
FormMasculine/Neuter, Genitive, Singular
मनसिin the mind
मनसि:
TypeNoun
Rootमनस्
FormNeuter, Locative, Singular
स्थितःsituated/abiding
स्थितः:
TypeAdjective
Rootस्था
FormPast Passive Participle, Masculine, Nominative, Singular
यःwho
यः:
TypePronoun
Rootयद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
यस्यof whom/whose
यस्य:
TypePronoun
Rootयद्
FormMasculine/Neuter, Genitive, Singular
हृदयेin the heart
हृदये:
TypeNoun
Rootहृदय
FormNeuter, Locative, Singular
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
FormAvyaya
अस्तिis
अस्ति:
TypeVerb
Rootअस्
FormPresent, Parasmaipada, 3rd Person, Singular
समीपस्थःstanding near/nearby
समीपस्थः:
TypeAdjective
Rootसमीपस्थ
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
अपिeven
अपि:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootअपि
FormAvyaya
दूरतःfrom afar/at a distance
दूरतः:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootदूरतः
FormAvyaya (ablatival adverb)
Chanakya (Kautilya)
अनुष्टुप्
Ancient EthicsSanskrit LiteratureHistorical PhilosophyAphoristic Poetics
Mind (manas)Heart (hṛdaya)Distance (dūra/samīpa)

FAQs

In the broader nīti (ethical-political aphorism) tradition associated with Cāṇakya, such couplets function as compact reflections on social bonds relevant to courts, diplomacy, and household life. The historical setting presumes a world of travel, separation, and shifting alliances, where remembrance and loyalty could be framed as forms of “nearness” independent of geography.

Proximity is described as a mental and affective condition: being ‘in the mind’ or ‘in the heart’ serves as the criterion for nearness, while physical adjacency without inner regard is characterized as distance. The verse thus records a conceptual distinction between spatial distance and relational presence.

The verse uses a balanced antithesis (dūra vs. samīpa; manas/hṛdaya vs. physical location) to redefine distance through interior states. The paired constructions (dūrastho’pi… / samīpastho’pi…) create a gnomic, epigrammatic effect typical of Sanskrit subhāṣita-style reasoning, emphasizing that social reality is mediated by cognition (manas) and affect (hṛdaya).