HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 2Shloka 32

Shloka 32

Sankhya YogaThe Yoga of Knowledge

Bhagavad Gita 32 illustration

यदृच्छया चोपपन्नं स्वर्गद्वारमपावृतम् । सुखिनः क्षत्रियाः पार्थ लभन्ते युद्धमीदृशम् ॥ २.३२ ॥

yadṛcchayā copapannaṁ svargadvāram apāvṛtam | sukhinaḥ kṣatriyāḥ pārtha labhante yuddham īdṛśam || 2.32 ||

O Pārtha, blessed are the kṣatriyas who obtain such a battle that comes unsought, as an opened gate to heaven.

O Partha, happy are the warriors who obtain such a battle that comes of itself, as an open gate to heaven.

And such a conflict, arrived at by chance—as if an opened gateway to heaven—fortunate are the kṣatriyas, O Pārtha, who obtain it.

“Heaven” (svarga) is often read as the epic’s idiom for honor and posthumous merit; modern readings may treat it as a culturally situated incentive rather than a universal claim.

यदृच्छयाby chance; accidentally; of its own accord
यदृच्छया:
Rootयदृच्छा
and
:
Root
उपपन्नम्come to (one); obtained; presented (to you)
उपपन्नम्:
Rootउपपद् (उप + √पद्)
स्वर्गद्वारम्the gate to heaven
स्वर्गद्वारम्:
Karma
Rootस्वर्ग-द्वार
अपावृतम्opened; uncovered; unbarred
अपावृतम्:
Rootअप + √वृ (वृञ् वरणे)
सुखिनःfortunate; happy; blessed
सुखिनः:
Rootसुखिन्
क्षत्रियाःkṣatriyas; warrior-rulers
क्षत्रियाः:
Karta
Rootक्षत्रिय
पार्थO Pārtha (son of Pṛthā)
पार्थ:
Rootपार्थ
लभन्तेobtain; get; find
लभन्ते:
Root√लभ्
युद्धम्battle; war
युद्धम्:
Karma
Rootयुद्ध
ईदृशम्such; of this kind
ईदृशम्:
Rootईदृश
KrishnaArjuna
DharmaSvarga (merit/heaven)Karma (action and result, implicit)
Epic warrior ethicsMerit as motivationOpportunity and responsibility

FAQs

It uses culturally resonant motivation—honor and meaningful purpose—to counter demoralization and withdrawal.

The verse operates mainly within a moral-cosmological framework of merit (puṇya) and reward (svarga), rather than nondual metaphysics.

Krishna appeals to Arjuna’s identity as a kṣatriya in the Mahābhārata milieu, where a just contest could be framed as spiritually and socially significant.

It may be read metaphorically as recognizing moments when ethical responsibility presents itself clearly, calling for courageous engagement rather than avoidance.