Shiva’s Kedara-Tirtha and the Rise of Mura: From Shaiva Pilgrimage to Vaishnava Theology
महामुद्रार्पितग्रीवो महाहिकुतकुण्डलः धारयाणः कटीदेशे महाशङ्खस्य मेखलाम्
mahāmudrārpitagrīvo mahāhikutakuṇḍalaḥ dhārayāṇaḥ kaṭīdeśe mahāśaṅkhasya mekhalām
Ang kaniyang leeg ay may tatak at palamuti ng dakilang mudrā, suot ang malalaking hikuta na hikaw, at sa baywang ay may bigkis na hinubog mula sa isang dakilang śaṅkha; sa gayong anyo, siya’y nagpatuloy sa paglakad.
{ "primaryRasa": "adbhuta", "secondaryRasa": "vira", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
It gives a localized Purāṇic rūpa-varṇana (form-description). Some elements are familiar (ornaments, distinctive emblems), while others—like a conch-girdle—are unusual and may signal a specific vrata-context or regional tradition preserved in this chapter.
Given ‘arpita-grīva’ (placed on the neck), ‘mudrā’ most naturally reads as a seal/mark/emblematic ornament rather than a hand-gesture. It indicates a visible sign of vow, identity, or consecration.
Yes, śaṅkha is strongly Vaiṣṇava in later iconography, but Purāṇic symbolism is fluid. A conch used as a mekhalā can underscore Śaiva–Vaiṣṇava symbolic overlap or a specific ritual accoutrement tied to the ‘mahāvrata’ context.