The Battle at Mandara: Vinayaka, Nandin, and Skanda Rout the Daitya Hosts
तच्छंभुवचनं श्रुत्वा शैलादिः प्राह संकरम् कः संदेहो महादेव यत् त्वं जयसि शात्रवान्
tacchaṃbhuvacanaṃ śrutvā śailādiḥ prāha saṃkaram kaḥ saṃdeho mahādeva yat tvaṃ jayasi śātravān
Nang marinig ang pananalita ni Śambhu, sinabi ni Śailādi kay Śaṅkara: “Anong pag-aalinlangan pa, O Mahādeva, na ikaw ay magwawagi laban sa mga kaaway?”
{ "primaryRasa": "shanta", "secondaryRasa": "vira", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
It is dialogue, but it carries stuti-like force: the rhetorical question ‘what doubt is there?’ functions as praise of Śiva’s invincibility and as morale-building for the gaṇas.
Purāṇic style layers epithets to highlight different theological facets simultaneously—benevolence (Śambhu), auspicious power (Śaṅkara), and supreme divinity (Mahādeva)—strengthening the assurance of victory.
No. The Vāmana Purāṇa alternates between tīrtha/geographical catalogues and mythic narratives (like Andhaka-vadha). This unit is narrative-theological, so it foregrounds omens, command, and devotion rather than place-names.