वाली–रामसंवादः
Rama’s Justification to Vali on Rājadharma
धर्ममर्थं च कामं च समयं चापि लौकिकम्।अविज्ञाय कथं बाल्यान्मामिहाद्य विगर्हसे।।
dharmam arthaṃ ca kāmaṃ ca samayaṃ cāpi laukikam | avijñāya kathaṃ bālyān mām ihādya vigarhase ||
Nang hindi nauunawaan ang dharma, artha, kāma, at maging ang mga karaniwang kalakaran ng mundo, paano mo ako masisisi dito ngayon dahil sa iyong isip-bata?
'Without correct knowledge of dharma, artha, kama and worldly ways, how do you reproach me bitterly now in total ignorance?
Ethical judgment requires knowledge of dharma and also of practical social norms; blame without understanding is portrayed as immature and unreliable.
After Vālī accuses Rāma of wrongdoing for shooting from concealment, Rāma begins a dharma-based rebuttal, challenging Vālī’s competence to judge.
Rāma’s commitment to reasoned dharma-discourse—insisting that moral critique must be grounded in knowledge rather than anger.