धर्मस्य बहुद्वारत्वम् — Nārada’s Audience with Indra (Śānti-parva 340)
शुकपत्रनिभ: किंचित् किंचित्स्फटिकसंनिभ: । नीलाञठ्जनचयप्रख्यो जातरूपप्रभ: क्वचित्,कुछ तोतेकी पाँखके समान हरा, कुछ स्फटिकमणिके समान उज्ज्वल, कहींसे कज्जलराशिके समान काला और कहींसे सुवर्णके समान कान्तिमान् था
śukapatranibhaḥ kiñcit kiñcit sphaṭikasaṃnibhaḥ | nīlāñjanacayaprakhyo jātarūpaprabhaḥ kvacit |
Sinabi ni Bhīṣma: “Nagpapakita ito ng pabagu-bagong mga kulay—kung minsan luntian na gaya ng balahibo ng loro, kung minsan maningning na gaya ng kristal; sa isang dako’y maitim na parang bunton ng kohl, at sa iba nama’y kumikislap sa ningning ng ginto.”
भीष्म उवाच
The verse highlights the variability of appearance—one object can seem many-colored depending on where and how it is seen. In Śānti Parva’s ethical instruction, such imagery commonly supports reflection on discernment (viveka): do not judge reality solely by surface impressions, which can shift with context.
Bhīṣma is describing something observed as having multiple, changing hues—green, crystal-bright, collyrium-dark, and gold-radiant—using vivid similes. The description functions as part of a larger didactic passage, where sensory imagery is used to clarify a point being taught.