Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 120

Śuka’s Guṇa-Transcendence and Vyāsa’s Consolation (शुकगति-वर्णनम्)

जातमात्रं तु तद्गरूपं दृष्टवा ताम्रनखाड्गुलि । कौमारं रूपमापन्नं रूपतो नोपलभ्यते

jātamātraṃ tu tad rūpaṃ dṛṣṭvā tāmranakhāṅguli | kaumāraṃ rūpam āpannaṃ rūpato nopalabhyate ||

Wika ni Bhishma: “Kapag bagong silang ang bata, ang anyong nakikita ay may mga kuko at mga daliring mapula na tila tanso. Ngunit pagdating niya sa pagkabata, ang dating anyong iyon ay hindi na natatanaw. Kaya ang panlabas na anyo ay di-matatag at patuloy na nagbabago sa paglipas ng panahon.”

जातमात्रम्just-born (at birth)
जातमात्रम्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootजातमात्र (जात + मात्र)
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
तुbut/indeed
तु:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootतु
तत्that
तत्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
गरूपम्form/appearance
गरूपम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootगरूप
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
दृष्ट्वाhaving seen
दृष्ट्वा:
TypeVerb
Rootदृश्
FormAbsolutive (Gerund)
ताम्रनखाङ्गुलिhaving copper-red nails and fingers
ताम्रनखाङ्गुलि:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootताम्रनखाङ्गुलि (ताम्र + नख + अङ्गुलि)
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
कौमारम्of boyhood/juvenile
कौमारम्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootकौमार
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
रूपम्form/appearance
रूपम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootरूप
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
आपन्नम्having attained/assumed
आपन्नम्:
TypeVerb
Rootआपद्
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular, क्त (past passive participle)
रूपतःas to form; in appearance
रूपतः:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootरूप
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
उपलभ्यतेis obtained/recognized
उपलभ्यते:
TypeVerb
Rootउप-लभ्
FormPresent, Passive, 3rd, Singular

भीष्य उवाच

B
Bhishma
N
newborn child
N
nails
F
fingers
C
copper

Educational Q&A

Bhishma highlights the impermanence of bodily appearance: what seems defining at birth vanishes in later stages. The ethical implication is to avoid pride or attachment based on external form and to value enduring qualities aligned with dharma.

In Shanti Parva, Bhishma instructs on wisdom and right understanding. Here he uses a simple observation about a child’s changing appearance—from newborn to boyhood—to illustrate how the body’s form is not constant and should not be treated as the basis of lasting identity.