Shloka 7
Vyaktāvyakta-Viveka and Nivṛtti as Paramā Gati
Manifest–Unmanifest Discrimination and the Supreme Path of Withdrawal
वेदेषु चापि यद् वाक््यं लौकिकं व्यापकं च यत् । एतद् विद्वन् यथातत्त्वं सर्व व्याख्यातुमहसि
vedeṣu cāpi yad vākyaṃ laukikaṃ vyāpakaṃ ca yat | etad vidvan yathātattvaṃ sarvaṃ vyākhyātum arhasi ||
Wika ni Bhīṣma: “Maging sa mga Veda ay may mga pahayag, at gayundin may mga aral na ukol sa pang-araw-araw na daigdig at malawak ang saklaw. Ngunit kahit dito ay waring may hindi pagkakatugma. Kaya, O marunong, ipaliwanag mo ang lahat ayon sa tunay na kalikasan ng katotohanan, upang maunawaan nang wasto ang kahulugan ng mga aral na ito.”
भीष्म उवाच
Educational Q&A
That even authoritative sources like the Vedas (and by implication related dharma-teachings) can appear mutually inconsistent, so a wise interpreter must explain them 'yathātattvam'—in a way aligned with the underlying truth and intent, not merely by literal or isolated readings.
In the Shanti Parva’s dharma-discourse, Bhishma frames a problem of interpretive conflict: teachings that are worldly and broadly applicable, even when found in the Vedas, may seem uneven or contradictory. He calls upon the learned interlocutor to provide a coherent, reality-grounded explanation of all such statements.