जनक-राज्ञः मौण्ड्य-परिव्रज्या-विवादः
Janaka’s Renunciation Questioned; Discourse on Dāna and Detachment
अनिष्कषाये काषायमीहार्थमिति विद्धि तम् धर्मध्वजानां मुण्डानां वृत्यर्थमिति मे मिति:
aniṣkāṣāye kāṣāyam īhārtham iti viddhi tam | dharmadhvajānāṁ muṇḍānāṁ vṛttyartham iti me matiḥ ||
Alamin na ang pagsusuot ng kasuotang kulay-oker habang hindi pa nalilinis ang dungis sa loob ay pagsisikap lamang para sa sariling pakinabang. Sa aking paghatol, para sa mga ahit-ulo na nagwawagayway ng bandila ng kabanalan, ito’y nagiging paraan lamang ng ikabubuhay—pagpapakitang-panrelihiyon na walang panloob na pagdalisay.
अजुन उवाच
Outer marks of renunciation (like ochre robes and a shaven head) are ethically meaningless if inner impurities—attachment, passion, and other दोष—remain. True dharma requires inner cleansing; otherwise religious symbols become tools for self-interest and livelihood.
Arjuna voices a critical judgment about pseudo-ascetics: if a person has not removed inner defilements, adopting ascetic dress is not genuine renunciation but a strategy for personal gain, turning धर्म into a public display and a means of subsistence.