Shloka 20
जनक-राज्ञः मौण्ड्य-परिव्रज्या-विवादः
Janaka’s Renunciation Questioned; Discourse on Dāna and Detachment
यस्त्वयं सर्वमुत्सृज्य धानामुष्टेरनुग्रह: । यदानेन सम॑ सर्व किमिदं हृवसीयसे
yastvayaṁ sarvam utsṛjya dhānāmuṣṭer anugrahaḥ | yadānena samaṁ sarvaṁ kim idaṁ hṛvasīyase ||
Wika ni Arjuna: “Kung matapos mong talikuran ang lahat ay humihingi ka pa rin ng pabor ng iba kahit para lamang sa isang dakot na butil, kung gayon ang kaharian at lahat ng pag-aari ay gayon din ang pag-asa. Ano pa ang natatangi sa pagtalikod sa kaharian—bakit mo ito ipinagluluksa?”
अजुन उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse challenges superficial renunciation: if one still depends on others’ favor even for basic sustenance, then giving up a kingdom is not inherently superior. True detachment is measured by freedom from craving and dependence, not merely by the scale of what is abandoned.
Arjuna addresses a renunciant figure and questions the logic of grieving after relinquishing royal power. He argues that both great wealth (a kingdom) and small needs (a handful of grain) can involve dependence; therefore lamenting the loss of kingship suggests incomplete inner renunciation.