प्रजाविसर्ग-तत्त्वनिर्णयः | Cosmogony of Elemental Emergence
Bharadvāja–Bhṛgu Dialogue
मृत्योर्वा मुखमेतद् वै या ग्रामे वसतो रति: । देवानामेष वै गोष्ठो यदरण्यमिति श्रुति:
mṛtyor vā mukham etad vai yā grāme vasato ratiḥ | devānām eṣa vai goṣṭho yad araṇyam iti śrutiḥ ||
Wika ni Bhīṣma: “Tunay, ang pagkahilig na manirahan sa nayon ay wari’y mismong bibig ng Kamatayan. Sapagkat ayon sa tradisyon (śruti), ang gubat ang tunay na pook ng pagtitipon ng mga diyos.”
भीष्म उवाच
Attachment to settled, comfort-oriented village life is portrayed as a direct doorway to spiritual decline and mortality, whereas the forest symbolizes austerity, simplicity, and proximity to the divine; the verse urges detachment and a turn toward disciplined living.
In Bhīṣma’s instruction during the Śānti Parva, he contrasts worldly habitation (the village) with the ascetic ideal (the forest), citing traditional authority (śruti) to elevate forest-dwelling as a sacred sphere associated with the gods.