Dama-pradhāna-dharma (Self-restraint as the Root of Dharma) — Śānti-parva 154
चक्षुर््या न च कर्णाभ्यां संशृूणोति समीक्षते । कस्मादेनं समुत्सूज्य न गृहान् गच्छताशु वै
cakṣurbhyāṁ na ca karṇābhyāṁ saṁśṛṇoti samīkṣate | kasmād enaṁ samutsṛjya na gṛhān gacchatāśu vai ||
Wika ni Jambuka: “Hindi na siya nakakakita sa mga mata, ni nakaririnig sa mga tainga. Kung gayon, bakit hindi ninyo siya iwan at magmadaling umuwi sa inyong mga tahanan?”
जम्बुक उवाच
The verse frames an ethical provocation: if someone appears incapable of seeing or hearing, should others abandon him and return to their own concerns? In the Shanti Parva’s moral discourse, such a question typically tests the listener’s commitment to dharma—especially compassion and responsibility toward the vulnerable—rather than endorsing neglect.
Jambuka addresses a group (plural imperative ‘gacchata’) and points out that the person in question neither sees nor hears. He then challenges them: why not leave him and go home quickly? The line functions as a pointed rhetorical move within a broader ethical discussion, pressing the audience to respond with the dharmic course of action.