Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 163

Adhyāya 33: Rauhiṇeya (Balarāma) is welcomed and takes his seat to witness the gadā-engagement

अत्यन्तवनवासाय सृष्टा भैक्ष्याय वा पुन: । 'फिर भी आपने बारंबार कहा है कि “तुम हमलोगोंमेंसे एकको भी मारकर राजा हो जाओ।/ निश्चय ही राजा पाण्डु और कुन्तीदेवीकी संतान राज्य भोगनेकी अधिकारिणी नहीं है। विधाताने इसे अनन्त कालतक वनवास करने अथवा भीख माँगनेके लिये ही पैदा किया है!

atyantavanavāsāya sṛṣṭā bhaikṣyāya vā punaḥ |

Sinabi ni Sanjaya: “Sila’y nilikha lamang upang mamuhay sa gubat magpakailanman—o kung hindi man, upang mabuhay sa limos.” Ang linyang ito’y isang malupit at mapanlibak na paratang na ginagamit upang ipagkait sa mga Pāṇḍava ang karapatan sa paghahari, na itinatakda ang kanilang tadhana bilang pagkatapon at pagkakait, hindi bilang soberanya.

अत्यन्तexcessively; for a very long time
अत्यन्त:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootअत्यन्त
वनवासायfor living in the forest; for exile
वनवासाय:
Sampradana
TypeNoun
Rootवनवास
FormMasculine, Dative, Singular
सृष्टाcreated; brought forth
सृष्टा:
Karta
TypeVerb
Rootसृज्
Formक्त, Passive (past passive participle), Feminine, Nominative, Singular
भैक्ष्यायfor begging; for alms
भैक्ष्याय:
Sampradana
TypeNoun
Rootभैक्ष्य
FormNeuter, Dative, Singular
वाor
वा:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootवा
पुनःagain; moreover
पुनः:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootपुनः

संजय उवाच

S
Sañjaya

Educational Q&A

The verse illustrates how adharma can be justified through fatalistic rhetoric: by declaring someone “born for exile or begging,” a speaker attempts to erase their legitimate rights and moral standing. It warns that appeals to ‘destiny’ can become tools of oppression and ethical distortion.

Sañjaya reports a cutting assertion made in the context of the Kurukṣetra conflict: the Pāṇḍavas are portrayed as fit only for forest-life or alms, not for royal power. The statement functions as a polemical denial of their claim to the kingdom and as verbal aggression amid the war narrative.