यद् भीमसेन सर्पैश्न विषयुक्तैश्न भोजनै: । आचरत् त्वन्मते राजा क्व ते धर्मस्तदा गत:
yad bhīmasena sarpaiś ca viṣayuktaiś ca bhojanaiḥ | ācarat tvanmate rājā kva te dharmas tadā gataḥ ||
Wika ni Sañjaya: “Nang sa payo mo, ang hari ay gumamit ng mga ahas at pagkaing may halong lason laban kay Bhīmasena—saan napunta ang iyong dharma noon?”
संजय उवाच
The verse indicts selective morality: one cannot invoke dharma only when convenient while having earlier endorsed deceit and lethal wrongdoing. Ethical accountability extends to advisers and enablers, not only to the direct actor.
Sañjaya challenges the addressee’s claim to righteousness by recalling an earlier attempt on Bhīma’s life—using snakes and poisoned food—done under that person’s counsel. He asks pointedly where their dharma was at that moment.