Babhruvāhana’s Lament and Appeal for Expiation (प्रायश्चित्त-याचना)
नाहं शोचामि तनयं हतं पन्नगनन्दिनि । पतिमेव तु शोचामि यस्यातिथ्यमिदं कृतम्,“नागकुमारी! मेरा पुत्र भी मरा पड़ा है, तो भी मैं उसके लिये शोक नहीं करती। मुझे केवल पतिके लिये शोक हो रहा है, जिनका मेरे यहाँ इस तरह आतिथ्य-सत्कार किया गया”
vaiśampāyana uvāca | nāhaṃ śocāmi tanayaṃ hataṃ pannaganandini | patim eva tu śocāmi yasyātithyam idaṃ kṛtam ||
Sinabi ni Vaiśampāyana: “O dalagang ahas, hindi ko ipinagluluksa ang aking anak na nakahandusay na patay. Ang tanging ipinagluluksa ko ay ang aking asawa—sapagkat nangyari ito matapos niyang maghandog ng marangal na pagtanggap sa panauhin (atithi-satkāra).”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
The verse highlights the moral gravity of atithi-dharma (hospitality): the speaker’s deeper anguish is that harm occurred in the setting of hospitality, bringing ethical blemish and social dishonor upon the husband/household, beyond the personal tragedy of a child’s death.
A woman addresses a serpent-maiden, stating that she is not primarily mourning her slain son; rather, she mourns her husband because the calamity has taken place in connection with hospitality extended to a guest—implying a grievous breach of the expected sanctity of guest-reception.