Uttanka’s Guru-Śuśrūṣā and the Commission to Retrieve the Maṇikuṇḍalas (उत्तङ्क-गुरुशुश्रूषा तथा मणिकुण्डल-आदेशः)
मेने प्रलब्धमात्मानं कृष्णेनामित्रघातिना । महाराज! मुनिके इनकार करते ही कुत्तोंसहित वह चाण्डाल वहीं अन्तर्धान हो गया। यह देख उत्तंक मन-ही-मन बहुत लज्जित हुए और सोचने लगे कि “शत्रुघाती श्रीकृष्णने मुझे ठग लिया'
mene pralabdham ātmānaṃ kṛṣṇenāmitraghātinā | mahārāja! munike inkāra karate hī kuttōṃ-sahita vaha cāṇḍāla vahīṃ antardhāna ho gayā | etad dṛṣṭvā uttaṅkaḥ manasā bahu lajjitaḥ sañcintayām āsa—“śatrughātī śrīkṛṣṇena ahaṃ vañcitaḥ” |
Sinabi ni Uttaṅka: “Nadama kong ako’y nadaya ni Kṛṣṇa, ang mamumuksa ng mga kaaway. O dakilang hari, nang tumanggi ang pantas, ang caṇḍāla na iyon—kasama ang mga aso—ay naglaho sa mismong lugar. Nang makita ito, si Uttaṅka ay lubhang napahiya sa kanyang kalooban at nagmuni: ‘Nilinlang ako ni Śrī Kṛṣṇa, ang tagapagwasak ng mga kaaway.’”
उत्तडुक उवाच
The passage highlights ethical self-scrutiny: when confronted with a puzzling or humiliating event, one should examine one’s own reactions—pride, suspicion, or rash judgment—rather than immediately blaming a higher power. Uttaṅka’s inner shame signals a moral awakening and the need for discernment (viveka) in interpreting extraordinary occurrences.
Uttaṅka believes Kṛṣṇa has deceived him. A Cāṇḍāla figure accompanied by dogs vanishes instantly when a sage refuses (or rejects) something connected with him. Witnessing this sudden disappearance, Uttaṅka feels intense inner embarrassment and concludes that Kṛṣṇa has tricked him, setting the stage for further clarification of the event’s true meaning.