Mind as Charioteer; Kṣetrajña, Tapas, and Dhyāna-Yoga
Adhyātma-Upadeśa
विषयो विषयित्वं च सम्बन्धो5यमिहोच्यते । विषयी पुरुषो नित्यं सत्त्वं च विषय: स्मृत:,इन दोनोंमें यहाँ यह विषय-विषयिभाव सम्बन्ध माना गया है। इनमें पुरुष तो सदा विषयी और सत्त्व विषय माना जाता है
viṣayo viṣayitvaṃ ca sambandho ’yam ihocyate | viṣayī puruṣo nityaṃ sattvaṃ ca viṣayaḥ smṛtaḥ ||
Wika ni Vāyu-deva: “Dito, ang ugnayang inilalarawan ay yaong ‘bagay’ at ‘paksa’—ang bagay na nararanasan at ang kalagayan ng pagiging nakararanas. Sa pares na ito, ang Puruṣa (ang may-malay na sarili) ay laging paksa (ang nakaaalam/nakararanas), samantalang ang sattva (prinsipyong pang-isip at pang-loob) ay itinuturing na bagay.”
वायुदेव उवाच
The verse distinguishes the experiencer from the experienced: Puruṣa is the constant subject (viṣayī), while sattva is treated as an object (viṣaya). Ethically, this supports detachment and self-mastery—one should not mistake mental states for the true Self.
Vāyudeva is instructing the listener in a philosophical framework (Sāṅkhya-like analysis), defining the subject–object relation to clarify how consciousness (Puruṣa) stands apart from the qualities and operations of the mind (sattva).